Thursday 7 March 2013

Read in 2013 - 8: Anglo-Saxon Britain

It was the year 1881 when this book by Grant Allen was first published. By that time, the author was only a few years into his writing career, which would eventually span the rest of his life (1848-1899) and yield an output of about 30 novels and numerous works of non-fiction.

Grant Allen (full name Charles Grant Blairfindie Allen) was born in Canada to Irish parents, spent part of his life in the U.S., on Jamaica (teaching there at a college for black women) and most of it in England, where he received his education at King Edward's school in Birmingham and graduated from Merton College in Oxford. (He does look rather like an old man there, doesn't he, in spite of him not reaching more than 51 years.)

His father was a protestant minister, but young Grant had different ideas: he became an agnostic and socialist. Being very much interested in psychology and evolution (and writing about both subjects), he even introduced some rather revolutionary concepts in his novels. One of his books, "The Woman Who Did", caused a scandal when it was published in 1895: it portrayed an independent unmarried woman who has a child. He even wrote some novels under a female pseudonym, and a few science fiction books.


In "Anglo-Saxon Britain", however, he was still pretty much a writer of science and history, and the book is compiled in a thorough and accurate manner, with many footnotes and always naming his sources, both contemporary and historical.

In the preface, he writes:
This little book is an attempt to give a brief sketch of Britain under the early English conquerors, rather from the social than from the political point of view. For that purpose not much has been said about the doings of kings and statesmen; but attention has been mainly directed towards the less obvious evidence afforded us by existing monuments as to the life and mode of thought of the people themselves. The principal object throughout has been to estimate the importance of those elements in modern British life which are chiefly due to purely English or Low-Dutch influences.
He goes on to explain how the Anglo-Saxon names are pronounced, a subject which is picked up again later in the book in an extra chapter about the development of the language (very interesting!).

Then he proceeds to outline the origin of the Anglo-Saxons, how the tribes lived on the Baltic coast, and their progress across the North Sea to the south-eastern part of Britannia, and spreading throughout what today is England.
A lot of what the author sees in his fellow Englishmen he traces back to characteristics - physical ones as well as socio-cultural ones - already firmly established with the first settlers originally from Sleswick and Friesland.
He contradicts some of the apparently popular theories of the time about the almost complete wiping out of the Celtic population, and does so with arguments brought forward in a logical manner.

The Anglo-Saxons are portrayed as a savage people, made up of warriors whose whole (often rather short) lives centred around warfare, constantly engaged in one fight or other, often against their nearest neighbours and only rarely fighting with them against a common enemy. 
What I found remarkable (because I had never thought about it that way before) was how Allen describes the essential role the first monasteries had in the development of anything worth being called civilization: they really were the only places a less blood-thirsty man could turn to if he wanted to learn about things and live in (relative) peace; they were practically islands of peace and learning, of culture and science, of reading and perfecting methods of agriculture, husbandry and much more, amidst a tumultous sea of permanent warfare. Monasteries and churches were accepted as being neutral in conflicts by most parties, and left in peace, which allowed them to grow and prosper in a manner impossible to any other community, continuously under threat of being burnt and plundered.

The history of the many small Anglo-Saxon kingdoms, later forming three main kingdoms until, at last, there was but one king of England, is well mapped out. Speaking of maps - a map would have been very useful to trace the movements of the various tribes, but my free kindle edition only contains the text of the book.

It was a good and interesting read, and would have been even better with some illustrations. If I'll come across another free ebook by this author, I think I'll download it. 

10 comments:

  1. Sounds interesting but I agree maps and illustrations are often helpful with this kind of book!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It was possibly without illustrations from the start; nowadays, non-fiction books are rarely found without any.

      Delete
  2. My Brother-in-Law majored in British history, and has a Master's in it; i'll recommend this to him (and take a peek myself, it's a fascinating subject).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. From some passages in the book, I assume it is part of a series; maybe I'll find some more.

      Delete
  3. This writer sounds like a real free thinker. I will look for more about him....I finally finished reading Teacher, Teacher and will be reading more from this author. We need things that make us smile! All of us do.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Since posting my review, I have realized that I have at least one more book by Grant Allen on my kindle; I must have downloaded it during those first few weeks after my birthday when I was on a veritable downloading-frenzy :-) No idea yet whether that other book is fiction or non-fiction, but it'll certainly get read & reviewed on here, too.

      Delete
  4. Very interesting and I was surprised to know that "The Woman Who Did" was that old. I had heard of it but assumed it was early twentieth century. I must read it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I haven't looked for it yet, but I, too, think it'll make a good and interesting read.

      Delete
  5. Apart from the seafaring history of the Nelson era (in which I had a serious interest at one time and still enjoy) I've never had much interest in political and social history. I was, however, interested in Constitutional history. I'm really not sure what part of your post sparked an interest but it has. The book sounds very readable too.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's not dwelling on one subject overly long, which makes it an easy read even without any illustrations. Some bits I already knew, but it was good to have them outlined like this.

      Delete